- The processes, methods and tools used for New Product Development (NPD) are insufficient for strategic innovation and strategic innovation is necessary for the accelerated growth that companies demand.
- Incubation is a way for large companies to succeed in creating strategic innovations, but incubation is currently an ill-defined system. The most promising approaches are designed for the startup ecosystem. An issue is how to adapt these to large companies.
- A comprehensive incubation framework can be based on two complementary approaches – Lean Startup and Effectuation – along with other components that fill out the incubation system architecture.
- Large companies need to become good at incubation now more than ever. They need intrapreneurs now more than ever. It is their path to achieve the organic growth they desire through strategic innovation.
“The value of an idea lies in the using of it.”
“You don’t learn to walk by following rules. You learn by doing and falling over.”
Richard Branson, founder of Virgin Group
“If you are not embarrassed by the first version of your product, you’ve launched too late.”
Reid Hoffman, LinkedIn Co-Founder and Venture Capitalist
Recently, a multi-billion dollar, international company looked at their innovation portfolio and realized that all it contained were opportunities totally aligned with (and supported by) its existing business units.
There were virtually no active projects for strategic opportunities that would expand their business beyond the area close to their core, and consequently no new offerings that they could rely on for accelerated future growth. When they examined the reasons why this was so, they determined that the only way to create new offerings was their tried-and-true New Product Development (NPD) process based on the stage-gate methodology introduced by Cooper in 1986. In digging further, they came to the realization that it was the stage-gate process itself (even with the new agile stage-gate modifications) that was the limiting factor. The linear nature of the process (even with constant customer iterations), the lack of system-level iteration and feedback, and the deterministic control mechanisms all conspired to make it difficult for any opportunity that wasn’t well within, or at least very close to the core, to even make it into the NPD process – much less succeed if it did. It was clear that a new methodology was needed.
A Definition of Incubation (from an Innovation Perspective)
For a company to successfully implement opportunities that stretch its strategic boundaries, there needs to be room to experiment in a non-deterministic, non-linear way. There needs to be a way, not only to tweak the design of a new opportunity, but also to challenge and reshape its underlying value proposition and business case throughout the process. For strategic innovations to be successfully pursued by a company, there needs to be an iterative cycle of experimentation – testing, learning, adapting, and testing again – until you get it right (or abandon it!). This period of experimentation requires a certain mindset, specific behaviors, a methodology that includes the appropriate tools, and a guide that can be used to check if you are on the right path. This is what is called ‘incubation’.
Incubation is the period between having a well-reasoned concept and an actual artifact (product, service, platform, business model, etc.) that can thrive in the world. The reason for having an incubation period (during which you are incubating a new opportunity) is to design and conduct experiments (and use the results) to get as close to a true, valuable manifestation of a new artifact as possible.
Sometimes new product development (NPD) is relatively straightforward, although it may be extremely costly and difficult. If uncertainty is low and the new artifact is relatively close to the company’s core, the NPD processes that companies use (such as stage-gate) are pretty good at producing a continuous stream of sustaining innovations. Incubation isn’t even an issue – just develop it! Today, however, sticking close to the core is just table stakes. Doing so will keep you alive, but it will also keep you penned into an increasingly smaller corner of the universe of possibilities.
Sometimes, though, incubation is really hard. When there are high levels of uncertainty in many dimensions – because the new artifact has never been done before and because it will require new competencies and behaviors that are different from the company’s current expertise – success is often elusive. It is this latter condition that is of interest. It is a defining aspect of strategic innovations that stretch or transform existing businesses boundaries.
In today’s world, VUCA is increasing at an accelerating pace. Within and near the core, that uncertainty can be managed (indeed the company itself may be the cause). Farther from the core, however, the causes are less familiar and the ways to address them are unknown. But the need to identify, define and implement new opportunities that are further from the core is increasing. This is where differential value can be created and where accelerated growth is possible.
Incubation in Startups and in Large Companies
Although there are many ways that incubation in large companies and startups are similar, there are some significant differences that have bedeviled those that have tried to apply startup approaches to large companies. Even the labels used – “Entrepreneur” in a startup and “Intrapreneur” in a company – indicate there is a meaningful difference. Large companies suffer from the legacy forces of culture, context and commitment that slow decision making, cause them to shy away from uncertainty, and that set expectations of guaranteed success.
A framework for incubation in large companies must take these differences into account and take advantage of a large company’s strengths to mitigate its weaknesses. To do this, a framework needs to be supported by the appropriate organizational structures. This usually involves a separate and distinct Corporate Innovation Group (CIG) that can operate independently of existing business units.
A Theory and Model of Incubation for Large Companies
Over the past decades, a number of people have discussed and developed approaches to incubation as a specific and important phase of innovation. Perhaps the most relevant early work on incubation as a distinct and important phase of innovation is the work of Gina O’Connor as described in her book Grabbing Lightning.
Today, two distinct and ‘comprehensive’ incubation frameworks have emerged, both of which were initially driven by the specific needs of start-ups.
- Lean Start-up – Advocated by Eric Ries, Steve Blank and others is inspired by ‘lean’ principles pioneered by Toyota in the mid-20th century for its production process.
- Effectuation – Developed by Saras Sarasvathy in the 1990’s based on her detailed research on startups and entrepreneurs.
There are numerous other methods, tools and approaches (e.g., McGrath Learning Plans, Collins Flywheel, etc.) that address aspects of the incubation process but by far the most common approach to incubation used by most companies is decidedly ad hoc.
In looking at these efforts, four key dimensions of a comprehensive model of incubation emerge.
- Mindset and Behavior – How do successful entrepreneurs behave? How do they think and decide?
- Path and Plan – What guide can one follow? How do you measure your progress?
- Process and Mechanism – How do you execute? What steps do you take to follow the path?
- Methods and Tools – What are the best tools to use to learn and develop?
Both of the predominant incubation frameworks, as well as the many other approaches to various aspects of incubation, emphasize one or two of these components. Lean Startup, for example, focuses on the Process and Mechanisms while Effectuation emphasizes Mindset and Behavior. However, there does not seem to be a comprehensive framework that incorporates all these aspects.
What would such a framework look like? Since incubation is about learning through experimentation, it might be useful to lean on the bastion of learning and knowledge acquisition – the scientific method. The scientific method is a mindset and codified behaviors, a methodology along with techniques and tools to use, guided by a set of principles. All of this is implemented by specific experiments that have a purpose and a plan. It turns out that the scientific method matches up quite nicely with the objectives and tactics of incubation.
This framework explicitly acknowledges incubation as a means of experimentation that applies at both the macro scale (e.g., testing fundamental business assumptions), and the micro scale (e.g., testing specific design features). It can also apply to both large companies and startups because it allows for some customization in each of the four dimensions of the framework based on situational circumstances. It supports the iterative and recursive, non-linear and non-deterministic nature of learning while, at the same time, providing a means of determining how to move forward and when you are done.
The Incubation Framework in Practice
People tend to think of successful entrepreneurs as individuals who don’t fit into large companies and only find their calling in a startup. For many entrepreneurs, this is true, but for every entrepreneur who starts a company there are at least ten qualified but frustrated intrapreneurs working within large companies who share the same motivations, characteristics, and skills as the most successful entrepreneur. What they lack, however, is a system that will support them.
A complete innovation system includes Domaining, Discovery, Incubation, and Acceleration phases. In large companies it is the incubation phase that is most in need of the attention and skills of an intrapreneur. The other phases of the innovation system are accommodated by different methods and tools that companies must also learn how to do well. But it is the incubation phase that transitions a new opportunity from concept to reality at the very point in time where the opportunity is in its most fragile state and could easily become malformed or mistakenly terminated.
The following diagram depicts a complete incubation system based on the framework described above. The specific detailed descriptions of the components are not relevant at this level of representation but are listed here to give a sense of what is involved.
- Mindset and Behavior – These are specific behaviors that Saras Sarasvathy has shown to be common to successful entrepreneurs and which are part of the Effectuation method. A brief description of each of these can be found here.
- Path and Plan – These consist of the Opportunity Readiness Levels (ORL) which are enumerations of critical uncertainties an opportunity needs to address. These are used to create learning plans that inform the what and how of experiments.
- Methods and Tools – These are specific tools to be used by the intrapreneur to perform the experiments and learn the knowledge that is required to get the opportunity ‘right’
- Process and Mechanism – This is the core test and learn engine that drives the incubation phase.
This incubation system must be embedded within an organization in the right way – with the appropriate network, governance and operational interfaces that will enable it to be effective.
Incubation in Large Companies (and why it is now more important than ever)
Strategic innovations are those that stretch the company’s boundaries and have the potential to transform the company’s businesses. They require the company to develop new competencies and to behave differently than they have in the past. These innovations disrupt the company’s well-established business practices that have driven it to be operationally excellent in its industry. But these same business practices are the ones that stand in the way of more ambitious and bold initiatives – the initiatives that will ultimately drive long-term, accelerated growth.
When an opportunity transitions to incubation it requires a commitment. The transition is significant. It is the start of taking an opportunity from the conceptual to the actual and it can involve significant resources. There are two problems that arise when this transition occurs, but a good incubation system solves both problems:
- False Abandonment – The situation in which a company instinctively rejects a good opportunity. There are many reasons why it is rejected – it’s not ‘us’, it’s too risky, the ROI is uncertain, etc. The cause of all these excuses is uncertainty. In Incubation, uncertainty starts relatively high while resource commitments are starting to become significant, creating a high level of organizational anxiety.
- Rushed Pursuit – The situation in which a company becomes so excited by a new opportunity that they rush ahead and inevitably get it ‘wrong’. There is a natural tendency by the business to want to rush through Incubation, or bypass it entirely, in the interest of getting to revenue generation.
Incubation is inherently complex. It is appropriate that this complexity is what enables a company to respond to an increasingly VUCA world. Without incubation, the means of experimenting with a new opportunity to learn what works and what does not doesn’t exist and the company will box itself into a corner and/or make increasingly frequent and costly mistakes.
But with complexity comes difficulty and effort. The types of experiments, and the planning of them, needs to be customized and adapted for the specific industry, company and type of opportunity. The incubation system needs to be embedded within the organization in the appropriate way and the company leadership must understand the long-term value of the effort. While this is difficult, the payoff is clear. It is the only, organic way to expand the company’s strategic boundaries and be the disruptor rather than the disrupted.
 Strategic innovations are those that are not routine or sustaining. They are ones that do not merely extend or adapt the company’s existing products and services, but instead stretch and transform a company and its ecosystem.